Maximising the engagement of older people with mental health needs and dementia with social care.

Older people with mental health needs and dementia often face difficulties with daily living and community participation, requiring the intervention of social care services. However, cognitive and emotional needs often mean that mainstream support is not appropriate. In England, mental health support workers may attempt to address these concerns, to prevent mounting care needs and the potential for institutional care. Yet, their work has not been researched to identify good practices and to understand the mechanisms through which they engage older people. A new qualitative study used semi-structured interviews and focus groups with specialist support workers (n = 22), managers (n = 7), homecare staff (n = 4) and service users and carers (n = 6). The latter group were interviewed by co-authors with lived experiences of dementia and care. Participants were recruited from mental health services, home care organisations and third-sector agencies across the North of England in 2020-2021. The study identified three themes that described support worker activities. First, 'building trusting relationships' identified steps to establish the foundations of later interventions. Paradoxically, these may involve misleading clients if this was necessary to overcome initial reluctance, such as by feigning a previous meeting. Second, 're-framing care' referred to how the provision of care was positioned within a narrative that made support easier to engage with. Care framed as reciprocal, as led by clients, and having a positive, non-threatening description would more likely be accepted. Third, 'building supportive networks' described how older people were enabled to draw upon other community resources and services. This required careful staging of support, joint visits alongside workers in other services, and recognition of social stigma. The study was limited by constrained samples and covid context requiring online data collection. The study recommends that support workers have more opportunity for sharing good practice across team boundaries, and improved access to specialist training.

A Qualitative Examination of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Individuals with Neuro-developmental Disabilities and their Families.

Individuals with neuro-developmental disabilities (NDD) have been profoundly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on focus groups with 24 service providers supporting this population, using an Interpretive Description approach, we examined perceived impacts of the pandemic on individuals with NDD and their families. The results highlight pandemic-related experiences which include: service reduction, the need for financial supports, relying on natural supports, and school-related challenges. Interruptions in services have resulted in intensified mental health issues for individuals with NDD and family caregivers, with particular concern for those with added social determinants of health-related barriers. Mitigating factors have also emerged, such as resilience and technology utilization to facilitate communication. Recommendations for resource flexibility and sufficiency as well as navigational support are offered.

Examining the Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Service Providers Working with Children and Youth with Neuro-developmental Disabilities and their Families: Results of a Focus Group Study.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed unprecedented service interruptions in many sectors including services for children and youth with neuro-developmental disabilities (NDD). Methods: We examined the experiences of service providers as they supported this population during the pandemic. Five focus groups were convened with 24 service providers offering support to children/youth with NDD and their families. Results: Results highlight substantial service changes and challenges, as observed by service providers. Service closures and program delivery modification resulted in the rapid adoption of virtual services and reduced program delivery. Service providers have faced heightened workloads, personal weariness and 'burn out', and new levels of conflict at work, yet with little opportunity and support for self-care. Beyond challenges, new learning and growth have emerged, with heightened collaboration amongst organizations. Conclusion: Strains in service delivery during the pandemic have exposed programming and systems gaps, for which proactive capacity building is warranted and recommended.

Immunotherapy responsive SARS-CoV-2 infection exacerbating opsoclonus myoclonus syndrome.

The global pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 has been known to have diverse neurologic complications among adult patients. The neurologic effects of SARS-CoV-2 in the pediatric population is poorly described, especially in those with rare underlying neurologic conditions. We describe the first known case of SARS-CoV-2 in a pediatric patient with refractory opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome. A 25-month-old female with progressive opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome secondary to metastatic neuroblastoma status-post resection and chemotherapy presented with worsening opsoclonus, tremor, and breakthrough seizures. She had no fever or respiratory symptoms at presentation. Urine catecholamines were unchanged, with low suspicion for tumor recurrence. She was found to have SARS-CoV-2 via nasopharnygeal PCR assay. She received intravenous immunoglobulin and dexamethasone therapy with improvement in opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome symptoms and was discharged home at her neurologic baseline. Patients with opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome may present with exacerbation of symptoms in the context of SARS-CoV-2. This case describes a sentinel report of a child with opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome presenting with worsening symptoms with concomitant SARS-CoV-2. Improvement in symptoms was achieved with standard of care therapies.